Accessibility Statement for cocomilkstudio.com
Last updated
October 6, 2025
WCAG Version
WCAG 2.1 AWCAG 2.1 AAWCAG 2.1 AAAWCAG 2.2 AWCAG 2.2 AAAdditional Best Practices (recommended)
Compliance Status
Compliant
Coverage
100% of Applicable WCAG Success Criteria Evaluated (Automated and Manual)
Our Commitment
Cocomilk Design Co. is committed to ensuring digital accessibility for people with disabilities. We aim to continually improve the user experience for everyone and apply the relevant accessibility standards in our design and development processes.
Standards Applied
We aim to conform to:
-
WCAG 2.2 Level AA
-
EN 301 549 v3.2.1 (European standard)
-
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (United States)
-
Title II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Scope of This Statement
This statement applies to all digital content, services, and files served under the domain:
This includes all webpages, subpages, web applications, downloadable documents, and other content hosted at or under this domain.
As of the last scan on 03 Oct 2025, a total of 42 unique pages are being continuously monitored by the AccessibilityChecker.org testing platform. This number is automatically updated with each new scan as new URLs are discovered or removed.
Testing & Evaluation
Last scan date
October 6, 2025
Automated test scope
AccessibilityChecker.org covers approximately 58% of WCAG 2.2 AA criteria through automation. The remaining items require human judgment and are addressed through the manual testing module.
Manual modules completion
Completed
22 out of 22 modules completed
Accessibility is evaluated through a combination of automated and manual processes provided by the AccessibilityChecker.org testing platform:
- Weekly automated scans identify all critical, machine-detectable issues across pages using WCAG logic
- A defined set of 22 manual checks is conducted internally by our team based on guided instructions from the platform
- Ongoing issue tracking automatically detects regressions and recognizes resolved items between scans
Together, these two layers of testing — automated + manual — are designed to fully cover all WCAG 2.2 Level AA success criteria.
Known Issues (as of last scan on 03 Oct 2025)
These issues are being addressed and are prioritized for the next sprint.
| WCAG Criterion | Issue Description | Source |
|---|---|---|
| No active issues found. | ||
Resolved Since Last Scan (as of last scan on 03 Oct 2025)
These issues are being addressed and are prioritized for the next sprint.
| WCAG Criterion | Issue Description | Pages Affected |
|---|---|---|
| Best Practice | Ensures the contrast between foreground and background colors meets WCAG 2 AA minimum contrast ratio thresholds | 15 |
| Best Practice | Ensures links have discernible text | 15 |
| Best Practice | Ensure that the page, or at least one of its frames contains a level-one heading | 34 |
| Best Practice | Ensures all page content is contained by landmarks | 42 |
| Best Practice | Ensures the order of headings is semantically correct | 6 |
| Best Practice | Ensure links are distinguished from surrounding text in a way that does not rely on color | 5 |
| Best Practice | Ensure ARIA Roles Are Correctly Applied | 42 |
| Best Practice | Ensure Prohibited ARIA Attributes Are Not Used | 3 |
| Best Practice | Ensure ARIA Roles Have the Required Parent Elements | 2 |
| Best Practice | Ensure ARIA Roles Are Applied Correctly | 42 |
| Best Practice | Ensures the contentinfo landmark is at top level | 8 |
| Best Practice | Ensures the main landmark is at top level | 36 |
| Best Practice | Ensures the document has at most one banner landmark | 7 |
| Best Practice | Ensures the document has at most one contentinfo landmark | 15 |
| Best Practice | Ensures the document has at most one main landmark | 36 |
| Best Practice | Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination | 42 |
| Best Practice | Elements marked as presentational should not have global ARIA or tabindex to ensure all screen readers ignore them | 4 |
| Best Practice | Ensures that every form element has a visible label and is not solely labeled using hidden labels, or the title or aria-describedby attributes | 1 |
| Best Practice | Ensures the complementary landmark or aside is at top level | 28 |
| Best Practice | Ensures the banner landmark is at top level | 29 |
| Best Practice | Ensures interactive controls are not nested as they are not always announced by screen readers or can cause focus problems for assistive technologies | 2 |
| Best Practice | Ensure Focusable Elements Are Not Contained Within aria-hidden Elements | 1 |
| Best Practice | Ensure Required ARIA Attributes Are Present | 3 |
| Best Practice | Ensure ARIA Attributes Have Valid Values | 1 |
Accessible Alternatives
If you are experiencing difficulty with any part of the website, you may request accessible formats or alternative access through the contact details below.
Feedback & Contact
We welcome your feedback on the accessibility of cocomilkstudio.com
EMAIL
[email protected]
ACCESSIBILITY LEAD
Jan-Daniel Belmonte
Technical Compatibility
Our website undergoes comprehensive accessibility evaluations to ensure compatibility across various devices and assistive technologies:
-
Automated Testing:
Conducted weekly using the AccessibilityChecker.org testing platform, covering both mobile and desktop interfaces to identify machine-detectable issues. -
Manual Testing:
A set of 17 essential manual tests is performed to assess aspects that require human judgment, using popular browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari) on both desktop and mobile devices. -
Assistive Technology Compatibility:
Tested with major screen readers (e.g., NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver) and across popular browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari) on both desktop and mobile devices.
Related Policies