Login See Plans

React Native Accessibility Best Practices: 2025 Guide for Mobile Developers

#MobileAccessibility #ReactNative #MobileApps
Photo of Researcher
Danny Trichter
Researcher
Photo of Expert
Filipe
Insights from
Our methodology

Our unique research methodology for digital accessibility combines user testing, feature analysis, and hands-on experience. We review various remediation software and platforms to provide top recommendations.

Written and researched for humans by humans
Photo of Researcher
Danny Trichter
Researcher
Photo of Expert
Filipe
Expertly reviewed by
Comments: 0
Scan your website for accessibility related issues for free

Slick animations and fast load times go a long way in creating a memorable mobile app, but the real question is whether or not everyone will be able to use it. 

Accessibility has become a fundamental part of building high-quality, inclusive apps that people actually love using, and designing with accessibility in mind doesn’t need to be complicated or time-consuming, either. 

In fact, when done right, it often leads to cleaner code, better UX, and a wider reach, all without sacrificing performance or design.

In this guide, we break down the most important React Native accessibility best practices for 2025 in a practical, developer-friendly way. 

You’ll learn how to support screen readers, improve keyboard and gesture navigation, design for visual and motor impairments, and avoid common accessibility pitfalls.

The Core Correlation: Web vs. Native Accessibility

If you’re coming from the web world, accessibility in React Native can feel strangely manual. On the surface, both environments aim to solve the same problem, which is making applications usable for everyone, but they take completely different paths to get there.

The biggest shift to understand is this:

On the web, accessibility is baked into the language. In React Native, you have to build it yourself.

Once you grasp this single concept, everything else starts to make sense.

The DOM vs. The Accessibility Tree (How the OS reads your app)

On the web, accessibility is driven by the DOM (Document Object Model). 

Screen readers parse your HTML structure, interpret semantic tags, and create an internal map of your page that users can navigate. If you use native elements like <button>, <input>, and <nav>, you get built-in accessibility for free.

React Native doesn’t expose a DOM, though. Instead, it renders native UI components that are interpreted by the operating system and converted into what’s called the Accessibility Tree.

Each platform (iOS and Android) builds its own internal representation based on what your app exposes through props like accessibilityRole, accessibilityLabel, and accessibilityState. If those props aren’t set, the OS has no idea what your interface means, only what it looks like.

So while the web browser automatically translates your HTML into an accessibility structure, React Native makes you explicitly construct it.

No semantics = no meaning = no accessibility.

Semantic HTML vs. accessibilityRole (Why <View> is dangerous)

In HTML, semantics come from the elements themselves:

  • <button> tells assistive tech it’s clickable.
  • <h1> announces itself as a heading.
  • <nav> defines a navigational region.
  • <input> tells users to expect interaction.

React Native doesn’t work this way.

Most components ultimately render as a <View>, and a <View> has no meaning on its own. To a screen reader, it’s just a box unless you tell it otherwise.

When you write:

Code example
<View onPress={handleSubmit}> <Text>Submit</Text> </View> Copy

It may look like a button…
It may act like a button…
But to assistive technology? It’s just “some content.”

To restore intent, React Native gives you accessibilityRole:

Code example
<View accessible={true} accessibilityRole="button" accessibilityLabel="Submit" onPress={handleSubmit} > <Text>Submit</Text> </View> Copy

Now the OS understands:

  • This is interactive
  • This is a button
  • This is labeled “Submit”

Without those props, every part of your app becomes a mystery to screen reader users.

That’s why <View> is dangerous. Not because it’s bad, but because it’s silent unless you speak for it.

Mapping ARIA to React Native Props

If you’ve worked with aria-* attributes before, you already understand the logic behind accessibility in React Native. The difference is simply where the meaning lives:

  • Web: Meaning comes from HTML tags + ARIA
  • React Native: Meaning comes entirely from accessibility props

You’re not “adding bonuses” in React Native. Instead, you’re rebuilding semantics from scratch.

Here’s how the two models translate:

Web Concept (HTML/ARIA) React Native Equivalent Purpose
aria-label=”Close” accessibilityLabel=”Close” Overrides text read by screen reader
<button>, <h1> accessibilityRole=”button”, “header” Defines the element’s purpose
aria-expanded, aria-disabled accessibilityState={{ expanded: true, disabled: true }} Communicates dynamic state
aria-live (Live Regions) accessibilityLiveRegion (Android) / AccessibilityInfo.announceForAccessibility() (iOS) Announces dynamic changes
onclick accessibilityActions + onAccessibilityAction Defines screen reader interactions

Think of this as translating HTML into native language for the operating system.

The accessibility props API is React Native’s version of semantic HTML, it’s just more explicit and less forgiving.

a screen with HTML code on it

Essential Accessibility Props

Once you understand that React Native doesn’t give you semantic meaning by default, accessibility props stop feeling optional and start feeling structural. 

Think of them as your app’s voice to the operating system. Without them, your interface may look perfect, but to a screen reader user, it can feel confusing, disjointed, or even unusable.

Here’s how the most important accessibility props work, and how to use them correctly.

accessible={true}: Grouping elements for focus

React Native exposes individual components to screen readers by default. Sometimes that’s good, and other times, it just creates noise.

The accessible prop tells the OS whether a component should be treated as one interactive unit instead of multiple child elements.

Compare this:

Code example
<View> <Text>Account balance</Text> <Text>$2,450</Text> </View> Copy

A screen reader might read both lines separately with no connection between them.

Now add:

Code example
<View accessible={true} accessibilityLabel="Account balance, $2,450"> <Text>Account balance</Text> <Text>$2,450</Text> </View> Copy

You’ve now grouped multiple visual elements into one meaningful announcement.

Use accessible={true} when:

  • Grouping label + value
  • Wrapping custom buttons
  • Turning a container into a single actionable element

Avoid overusing it, though, because making large containers accessible can:

  • Trap focus
  • Hide important child elements
  • Break navigation order

Rule of thumb: Group meaning, not layout.

accessibilityLabel: When to use it (and when NOT to)

This prop overrides what a screen reader announces.

It’s incredibly powerful, but also incredibly easy to misuse.

Use accessibilityLabel when:

  • The visible text isn’t descriptive enough
  • An icon has no text
  • The label needs clarification

Example:

Code example
<TouchableOpacity accessibilityLabel="Close modal" onPress={closeModal} > <Icon name="x" /> </TouchableOpacity> Copy

Without a label, the screen reader might announce: “Button. Unlabeled.”
With a label, the action becomes obvious.

However, don’t use accessibilityLabel to repeat visible text unnecessarily.

Bad:

<Text accessibilityLabel=”Settings”>Settings</Text>

Good:

<Text>Settings</Text> // Let the OS read it natively.

When you override text that’s already readable, you:

  • Add maintenance overhead
  • Risk desync between UI and screen reader
  • Slightly harm localization workflows

Use labels to add meaning, not duplicate it.

accessibilityHint: Providing context without clutter

Great labels tell users what something is, but hints tell users what will happen when they interact.

Example:

Code example
<TouchableOpacity accessibilityLabel="Download invoice" accessibilityHint="Saves a PDF to your device" > <Icon name="download" /> </TouchableOpacity> Copy

Now the screen reader announces: “Download invoice. Saves a PDF to your device. Button.”

Use accessibilityHint when:

  • The outcome isn’t obvious
  • The control has side effects
  • The result is irreversible (delete, submit, purchase)

Avoid using hints for:

  • Obvious actions (“Opens menu”)
  • Repeating the label
  • UI instructions (“Tap here”)

When creating a hint, ask yourself: “What happens next?”

accessibilityValue: Handling sliders and progress bars

Interactive controls like sliders, steppers, and progress bars require more than just a label because users need to know the current state.

That’s where accessibilityValue comes in.

Example:

Code example
<Slider accessibilityLabel="Volume" accessibilityValue={{ min: 0, max: 100, now: 65 }} /> Copy

A screen reader will announce: “Volume. 65 percent.”

You can also make progress indicators readable:

Code example
<View accessibilityRole="progressbar" accessibilityValue={{ min: 0, max: 100, now: progress }} /> Copy

Use accessibilityValue for:

  • Sliders
  • Rating controls
  • Progress indicators
  • Any input with a numeric or measurable value

If your control updates dynamically:

  • Pair accessibilityValue with
    • accessibilityLiveRegion (Android)
    • AccessibilityInfo.announceForAccessibility() (iOS)

to notify users when values change in real time.

Handling Dynamic Content

Dynamic UI is where accessibility breaks most often, and most silently.

When content updates visually, sighted users immediately notice the change. But for screen reader users, nothing has changed unless you explicitly tell the operating system something happened.

React Native does not infer meaning from animations, state changes, or re-renders. If new content appears, errors trigger, or views change, and you don’t announce it, the user is left in the dark.

Managing Focus: Using AccessibilityInfo.setAccessibilityFocus

Focus management is essential when UI changes significantly. For example:

  • Opening a modal
  • Displaying an error
  • Redirecting to a new screen
  • Revealing new content

Screen readers maintain their own cursor, so when your UI updates, that cursor doesn’t move unless you move it.

React Native provides:

AccessibilityInfo.setAccessibilityFocus(nodeHandle)

Typical usage:

Code example
const ref = useRef(null); useEffect(() => { if (isVisible) { const node = findNodeHandle(ref.current); if (node) { AccessibilityInfo.setAccessibilityFocus(node); } } }, [isVisible]); Copy

This tells the screen reader: “Something important is here. Read this now.”

Use focus setting when:

  • Opening dialogs or modals
  • Navigating between screens
  • Moving users to error messages
  • Revealing content after async work

Do NOT use it:

  • For every change
  • On background updates
  • For cosmetic UI effects

Good focus behavior should always feel like guided navigation.

Live Updates: Announcing Errors or Success Without Moving Focus

Not every update deserves focus. Sometimes, you just need to speak.

Think about:

  • “Payment successful”
  • “Password incorrect”
  • “Profile updated”
  • “Connection lost”

These don’t require re-navigation, but they absolutely require awareness.

Android: accessibilityLiveRegion

Code example
<Text accessibilityLiveRegion="polite"> Profile saved successfully </Text> Copy

This tells Android: “Announce this change when it updates.”

Modes:

  • “polite” – wait for current speech to finish
  • “assertive” – interrupt immediately (use sparingly)

iOS: AccessibilityInfo.announceForAccessibility()

Code example
AccessibilityInfo.announceForAccessibility('Profile saved successfully'); Copy

This immediately speaks the message without moving focus.

Best practices:

  • Announce state, not UI mechanics
  • Keep messages short
  • Avoid repetition
  • Never spam announcements

Rule of thumb: Move focus for navigation. Announce for feedback.

Loading States: Handling “Busy” indicators (aria-busy equivalent)

Spinners may look obvious, but to a screen reader user, they’re invisible unless you expose their intent.

On the web, you’d use:

aria-busy=”true”

In React Native, you communicate loading through:

  • accessibilityState={{ busy: true }}
  • Role-based components (e.g., progressbar)
  • Spoken announcements

Example:

Code example
<View accessibilityRole="progressbar" accessibilityState={{ busy: true }} accessibilityLabel="Loading data" > <ActivityIndicator /> </View> Copy

This tells assistive tech: “This area is currently working.”

When loading completes, always update state:

AccessibilityInfo.announceForAccessibility(‘Loading complete’);

Best practices for loading states:

  • Announce when work starts and ends
  • Make sure controls are disabled while busy
  • Avoid infinite unlabeled spinners
  • Never rely on visuals alone

a hand holding a mobile phone with a white speech bubble on it

Platform-Specific Nuances (iOS vs. Android)

React Native promises “write once, run anywhere”, but accessibility is where that promise has some limits.

Under the hood, iOS and Android use fundamentally different accessibility systems. React Native only provides a bridge between them, which means the same code can behave very differently depending on the platform.

If you design accessibility based on just one device, you will break it on the other.

Understanding how the two platforms think about focus, navigation, and announcements is the difference between “technically accessible” and “actually usable.”

Differences in Navigation Behavior

On both platforms, screen readers let users move through the interface, but they do it in very different ways.

iOS (VoiceOver-style navigation)

  • Users swipe left/right to move through every accessible element
  • Navigation is sequential and linear
  • Headings and landmarks matter more
  • Focus tends to follow screen order closely

If your hierarchy is messy, VoiceOver will expose it.

Android (TalkBack-style navigation)

  • Navigation is more spatial and region-based
  • Focus may jump between containers
  • Gesture navigation is more forgiving
  • Live regions behave differently
  • Android respects importantForAccessibility more aggressively

This means two visually identical layouts can feel completely different depending on the device.

How TalkBack Handles Focus vs. VoiceOver

This is where most real-world issues show up.

VoiceOver (iOS)

VoiceOver is strict.

If your accessibility tree is broken, cluttered, or incorrectly grouped, iOS will force the user to experience every mistake.

Key behaviors:

  • Focus order matches render order
  • Unlabeled elements are painful
  • Hints are read consistently
  • Duplicate labels are obvious
  • Modals require aggressive focus handling
  • Incorrect roles stand out immediately

iOS favors semantic structure over layout tricks, so if you don’t guide focus, VoiceOver will wander.

TalkBack (Android)

TalkBack is layered and forgiving. Sometimes, maybe a little too forgiving.

It tries to infer meaning when your accessibility props are vague, which is helpful until it isn’t.

Key behaviors:

  • Focus can jump unexpectedly
  • Containers may consume child focus
  • Live regions may repeat announcements
  • Role handling is less strict
  • Touch exploration affects focus order
  • State changes may not re-announce reliably

Android relies more heavily on:

  • importantForAccessibility=”yes|no|no-hide-descendants”
  • Proper grouping
  • Explicit role and state configuration

If your UI works on Android but feels “sloppy” on iOS, your semantics probably aren’t strong. And if it works on iOS but fails on Android, your grouping probably isn’t.

The Golden Rule

Test on both! Not eventually, not before release, every feature.

Because accessibility bugs:

  • Don’t throw errors
  • Don’t break builds
  • Don’t show in UI tests
  • Don’t crash apps

They only break users.

Testing Your Implementation

If accessibility isn’t tested, it isn’t real.

Your code may look perfect, your components may be well-labeled, and your props might follow best practices, but until you test with assistive technologies enabled, you don’t actually know whether your app is accessible.

React Native doesn’t give you visual failure states for accessibility bugs.

Testing is where correctness becomes usability.

Using the Accessibility Inspector (Xcode & Android Studio)

Native tooling is still your most reliable window into what screen readers actually see.

iOS: Accessibility Inspector (Xcode)

Xcode’s Accessibility Inspector shows you:

  • What elements are focusable
  • What labels are being read
  • Which traits are applied
  • Role consistency
  • Navigation order

It also lets you:

  • Simulate VoiceOver
  • Click through accessible elements without touching your phone
  • Identify unlabeled elements visually
  • Inspect modal focus behavior

Pro tip: If a View appears clickable visually but doesn’t appear in the inspector, it doesn’t exist to VoiceOver.

Android: Layout Inspector & Accessibility Scanner

Android offers two essential tools:

Layout Inspector (Android Studio):

  • Shows which elements are exposed
  • Highlights focus order
  • Lets you inspect roles and properties
  • Reveals when containers swallow children

Accessibility Scanner (Google Play app):

  • Flags missing labels
  • Detects low contrast
  • Identifies touch target issues
  • Suggests role corrections

Android tooling is more diagnostic and less behavioral, so you’ll still need to test in real TalkBack sessions.

Manual Testing Checklist (Gestures, Focus Order, Labeling)

Automation will catch syntax problems, but only humans catch confusion.

Before shipping, it’s important to manually test your app with:

  • VoiceOver enabled on iOS
  • TalkBack enabled on Android

Then walk through this checklist:

Focus & Navigation

  • Can you swipe through every interactable element?
  • Does focus move in a logical order?
  • Are modals announced and focused correctly?
  • Can you escape overlays and dialogs easily?
  • Are hidden elements truly hidden?

Labeling

  • No “Button” with no name
  • Icons announce purpose
  • Labels are concise and accurate
  • No redundant verbosity
  • Dynamic labels update correctly

Interaction

  • Can you activate every control with gestures alone?
  • Sliders announce values
  • Toggle states are spoken
  • Disabled states are clear
  • Error messages are announced

Feedback

  • Loading states are announced
  • Success/failure is audible
  • No silent UI changes
  • No repeated announcements
  • No surprise focus jumps

If something feels awkward to you, it’s probably worse for your users.

Automated Tools (eslint-plugin-react-native-a11y)

Linting can’t replace testing, but it prevents avoidable mistakes from shipping.

eslint-plugin-react-native-a11y catches issues like:

  • Missing accessibility roles
  • Missing labels on touchables
  • Invalid accessibility props
  • Misused accessibilityHint
  • Incorrect focusable patterns

Example rule:

Code example
{ "react-native-a11y/has-accessibility-hint": "warn" } Copy

This kind of feedback:

  • Saves review time
  • Educates junior devs
  • Prevents regressions
  • Enforces standards

Accessibility As a Strong Mobile Foundation

In React Native, accessibility isn’t something you bolt on at the end of development. It’s something you build in from the first component. 

Unlike the web, where semantic HTML does a lot of the heavy lifting, mobile accessibility only works when you intentionally map meaning into every interaction.

The good news? Once you understand how semantics, focus, and state work together, accessibility stops being mysterious and starts becoming mechanical, and that’s a great thing.

You write better components, your UX improves, and your app becomes usable by more people, in more situations, on more devices.

Build it once. Build it right. Build it for everyone.

With over 14 years of experience in digital strategy, Casandra helps global brands create accessible, user-friendly online experiences. She’s deeply passionate about web accessibility and committed to making online content inclusive for everyone, regardless of ability. Casandra has spent years studying WCAG guidelines, accessibility tools, and assistive technologies to better support businesses in building compliant websites. Her goal is to educate teams across all industries on the importance of digital inclusion and empower them to create content that truly works for everyone.

Photo of Researcher
Danny Trichter
Researcher

Danny Trichter is a dedicated researcher specializing in digital accessibility, ensuring that websites and digital platforms are usable by everyone, including those with disabilities. Beyond his professional pursuits, Danny enjoys exploring new destinations, sharing his travel experiences on his blog, and discovering hidden gems in Thailand where he currently resides. In his leisure time, he loves hiking, connecting with nature, and capturing the beauty of the world through his camera lens

Photo of Expert
Filipe
Expert
How we reviewed this article
  1. Current version
  2. First Draft of the Article December 1, 2025

    What we changed

    This article was reviewed by both an accessibility specialist and a mobile developer prior to uploading

0 comments

guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments